FSFundraiserScout
Who runs this site: Fundraiser Scout is operated by the team at booster (booster.club). We rank our own platform on this site — scored with the same published rubric as everyone else, including the categories where we lose. Read our methodology →

2026-27 Rankings / Head-to-head

Head-to-head · Updated July 2026

booster vs. Snap! Raise: half the fee, none of the contact lists

We make booster, so read this with that in view — every claim is sourced, and Snap! wins a category below fair and square. The fees differ (our flat 10% vs. their 20%-plus), but the deeper choice is the mechanic: a compounding subscriber base vs. a two-week blitz that resets every August.

The one-line version: Snap! Raise takes 20%-plus and asks your students for twenty family phone numbers to run a two-week blitz that resets every year. booster takes a flat 10% and doesn't — it builds a subscriber base that pays your program monthly, including all summer. Half the fee. Opposite philosophy.

Where Snap! Raise honestly wins

Coach effort. A Snap! rep runs the whole campaign — setup, push, close — in about two weeks. booster requires someone in your program to keep posting content through the season. If nobody has those hours, Snap! is the rational pick, and we'd rather tell you that than have you churn.

Year-one sprint totals. A strong rep-led campaign averages ~$6,000 raised in two weeks. A subscription base takes months to build to the same annual run-rate.

Where booster wins

  • The reset. Snap! campaigns carry nothing forward — no donor list, no momentum. booster subscribers persist; year two starts where year one ended.
  • Student data. No contact-list submissions, no per-athlete quotas, no templated asks sent to relatives your families never approved.
  • The fee, twice over. Snap! takes 20% — rising to an unpublished number if your team misses its participation goal. booster takes a flat 10%, in writing, no conditions.
  • The off-season. Subscriptions pay in June, July, and August. Campaigns don't.

How to actually decide

  • Pick Snap! Raise if: you need a proven number this month, no one can run anything, and you get the below-goal rate in writing first.
  • Pick booster if: your program fundraises every year (that's the reset tax compounding), someone can post content weekly, and you want revenue that survives the summer.
  • Either way: run both through the True-Cost Calculator — it shows the year-one and year-two curves side by side for your roster and goal.
Sources for every fee claim: see each platform's scouting report and /fees.
boosterSnap! Raise
Scout Score 9.3 Exceptional 8.8 Excellent
All-in cost 10% flat + card processing — teams keep 90%20% if participation goal met; unpublished higher rate if missed
Revenue carries over ✓ Yes subscriptions persist ✕ No
Off-season revenue ✓ Yes ✕ No
Student contact lists required ✓ No ✕ Yes
Per-athlete quotas ✓ None ✕ Common
Product / cash logistics NoneNone
Coach effort Ongoing, lightLowest — rep-run
See how booster works → Read the full Snap! Raise scouting report
Does Snap! Raise or booster raise more money?

In a single season, a well-run Snap! campaign usually wins — ~$6,000 in two weeks is a real number. Over multiple seasons the math flips if subscriber churn stays low, because booster revenue compounds while campaign totals reset to zero. The crossover point for typical programs is late year one to mid year two.

What do booster and Snap! Raise actually charge?

booster: a flat 10% plus Stripe processing — teams keep 90%, no conditions (reduced from 20% in 2026). Snap! Raise: 20% if the participation goal is met, an unpublished higher rate if not, with donors covering ~4% processing on top. Get any rep-quoted rate in writing.

Which is safer for student data?

booster, structurally: supporters arrive through shared links, so no minor's contact list is ever collected. Snap!'s model is built on athletes submitting 20+ family contacts — the mechanic most criticized by parents and student journalists alike.